The Future of Work: Trust vs. Control—Which Will Win?

Companies like Citi are betting on trust. The government is doubling down on surveillance. The leadership model that wins will define work for years to come.

This week, two leadership stories made headlines—and they couldn’t be more different.

1️⃣ Citigroup’s CEO, Jane Fraser, is standing firm on hybrid work, resisting pressure to force employees back to the office like so many in her industry have. Her approach? Treat people like adults. Give them flexibility, trust them to deliver, and build a culture where results matter more than physical presence.

2️⃣ The U.S. government is taking the opposite approach. A massive crackdown on federal employees is underway, gutting jobs, forcing workers back to the office, and ramping up surveillance—down to their keystrokes. The message? Work is something to be controlled, not trusted.

Two leadership models. Two different futures. Which one will define the workplace?

This week, we’re breaking down why leaders are facing this fork in the road—and what’s at stake for the future of leadership, trust, and work itself.

The Illusion of Control: What Leaders Get Wrong About Power

For decades, many leaders have operated under the myth that control equals performance. The more oversight, the more rules, the more surveillance—the more productive employees will be.

But here’s the truth: Control doesn’t create better work. It just creates more fear.

🚨 What we know:

  • Surveillance doesn’t improve productivity—it erodes trust. Research shows that when employees feel monitored, engagement drops, innovation slows, and turnover increases.

  • Mandating presence ≠ impact. Leaders forcing employees back to the office aren’t solving performance issues—they’re avoiding the real work of building culture and alignment.

  • The highest-performing teams operate on trust, not fear. Companies that empower autonomy, flexibility, and clear goals (instead of micromanagement) outperform those that rely on rigid control.

💡 Lesson: Citi’s approach isn’t just about hybrid work—it’s about leading with trust and autonomy. The government’s approach isn’t just about cost-cutting—it’s about defaulting to fear-based management.

The Future of Work: Will Leaders Choose Trust or Control?

Right now, leaders face a choice. Do we double down on control—or build cultures of agency and accountability?

✅ A leader who chooses control:

  • Forces presence over performance

  • Relies on monitoring and surveillance

  • Sends the message that employees can’t be trusted

✅ A leader who chooses trust:

  • Measures impact, not hours worked

  • Gives employees ownership over their work

  • Builds an environment where people want to contribute—not one where they fear consequences

Of course, not every role can be flexible. Some jobs require an in-person presence—but that doesn’t mean leadership should default to blanket mandates or monitoring. The best leaders recognize that the real challenge isn’t choosing between control and autonomy—it’s designing work models that balance operational needs with trust and flexibility.

📌 The data is clear: The most successful organizations aren’t the ones tracking every keystroke. They’re the ones building cultures where employees feel valued, trusted, and empowered.

Keep Reading with a 2-Week Free Trial

Upgrade to keep reading this post and get 14 days of free access to the weekly newsletter and full post archives.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.

A premium subscription gets you:

  • • Weekly premium-only posts and full archive (free subscribers receive the 1 full post a month)
  • • Additional insights, exercises, and recommendations from our team
  • • First look at new products and services

Reply

or to participate.